Tip 1: What is the right

Jurisprudence

Tip 1: What is the right

In modern science the generally accepted definitionthe concept of "right" does not exist. Along with morality and morality, it is one of the regulators of social relations. The question of the essence of law, its foundations and origin is not resolved in science to the present day.

Law is a set of norms thatdetermine the rules binding on all people that determine their mutual relations. According to the classical Marxist-Leninist jurisprudence, the law is a set of generally binding rules of conduct that are established and sanctioned by the state, the enforcement of which is provided by state regulation. In law theory, various signs of law are called, most authors singles out such things as: - normativity (the law establishes certain rules of behavior); (the law is independent of the will of individuals), - formal certainty (the norms of law are expressed in the form of legislative acts), - non-personalization (the rules of law are directed to unlimited number of subjects) - the repeated operation of the rules of law (the rules of law are designed for multiple applications) - systematic (law is a coherent, interrelated structure). Forms of expression of the lens th right are: legal act, normative treaties, legal practice and judicial pretsedent.Normativno legal act - a document which is made by the authorized state body in order to establish, change or cancel the law. A normative contract is an agreement that contains rules of conduct that are mandatory for everyone (ie, the rules of law). Legal custom is a set of certain rules prescribing a strict line of conduct in specific situations. Prerequisites for the emergence of the right custom are stability and repeated frequency of social relations, which cause certain stereotypes of behavior in the individual and mass consciousness. These stereotypes become the source of law. A judicial precedent is an enforceable court decision on a specific case that establishes, alters or abolishes legal norms.

Tip 2: What is the veto power

The famous Roman law, which existed inAncient Rome and the Byzantine Empire more than a thousand years in the period from VIII BC to VIII century AD, formed the basis of legal systems of European states. One of the indispensable attributes of Roman law is a veto, which differs by "strong" and "weak."

With a weak veto, the parliament / internationalThe organization is only required to review the bill again. A strong veto by definition is more difficult to overcome, and such a rule is usually enjoyed by presidents in developed countries (USA, Germany and others).

History of law

The history of the veto goes back to the era of ancient Rome,when the people's tribunes were created, called to uphold the rights of the lower strata of the population - the plebeians. In translation from the Latin language, veto means "forbid". Therefore, as the name implies, this is the right to limit anything. The legal system of the Roman Empire has formed the basis of many European legal systems, so the use of restrictive law is logical.

Veto Value

This right gives an opportunity to one personor a group of persons unilaterally block the adoption of certain written and oral decisions. That is, for example, if 30 people voted for the adoption of the draft (resolutions, resolutions and similar decisions), and only one voted against it by vetoing, the draft is not adopted and a new voting date is appointed. It is noteworthy that the right to veto an unlimited number of times is the right of any of the participants in the discussion, the meeting, the committee. Therefore, the adoption of a general solution can be delayed for many years, and ultimately not even be accepted. Veto is actively used by international organizations in making decisions of any importance. It can often be heard that, for example, at a meeting of the UN (NATO, the European Parliament and other international organizations), a representative of one of the countries took advantage of the veto, and the adoption of the document is blocked. Among the vivid examples of the prolonged use (to some extent on the verge of permanent) of such a restrictive right, we can note the position of Greece in relation to Turkey's intentions to join the European Union. Already for 14 years, largely thanks to the Greek veto, the Republic of Turkey will not make use of the obvious and imaginary benefits of accession to Europe. Also worth noting is the "fresh" example of imposing a veto. This is the adoption of the UN Security Council resolution on the legality of the referendum in the Crimea. To be more precise, it is in non-acceptance of the international document because of its blocking by the Russian Federation as a permanent member of the UN Security Council. It is noteworthy that the representatives of the People's Republic of China abstained in the vote, which to some extent guarantees a long discussion of the resolution.