Tip 1: Leadership as a political phenomenon

Tip 1: Leadership as a political phenomenon


Leader is a phenomenon that since ancient timesaccompanies the human society. Every society needs a leader to give the system an orderly look and preserve its integrity. He has a specific set of qualities that distinguishes him from an ordinary individual.



Leadership as a political phenomenon


Leadership exists in any society and is its invariable sign. The leader is the person for whom this community recognizes the right to make the most meaningful decisions.

Approaches to the definition of political leadership

Leadership exists in any society and isits invariable sign. The leader is the person for whom this society recognizes the right to make the most significant decisions. The ancient leaders also showed interest in leadership. They gave the political leaders the dominant attention, seeing in them the creators of history. In the Middle Ages, the idea of ​​God's election leader dominated. A great contribution was made by Nietzsche, who formulated two theses, which were further developed in political psychology. The first thesis concerns the nature of leadership as an irrational, instinctive force linking the leader and followers. The second - ascribes to a person outstanding qualities that turn him into a superman. In the future, many psychologists insisted on the irrational origins of political leadership. The first holistic concepts of political leadership were formulated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Regarding the essence of political leadership, there are different opinions among scientists, depending on the emphasis placed on this or that factor of leadership. There are points of view according to which leadership is classified as a kind of power. Others understand leadership as managerial status associated with decision making. Political leadership is also seen as an enterprise in which leaders in competitive struggle exchange their programs for managerial positions.

Formal and informal leadership

There are two types of leadership: this is "face-to-face leadership," carried out in small groups, and "distant leadership" or leader leadership. In the first case, all participants in the process have the opportunity to interact directly with each other, and in the second they may not be personally acquainted. In the second case, the indispensable attribute of the leader is the institutionalization of his role, i.e. he must occupy any power position. Thus, his personal qualities may fade into the background, especially if the power position is not elective. But informal leadership in the group reflects the willingness and ability to perform leadership functions, as well as the recognition for him and the right to leadership by members of society.

Typology of political leaders

There are different approaches to classificationleaders. The most famous was the theory of M. Weber, who distinguished traditional, charismatic and bureaucratic leadership. Traditional leadership is characteristic of patriarchal societies. It is based on the habits of submission to the leader, the monarch, etc. Legal leadership is an impersonal leadership. In this case, the leader only performs his functions. Charismatic leadership of personal qualities of the leader and his ability to unite people and lead them for themselves. Leadership can be authoritarian or democratic from the point of view of the style of decision-making. By the nature of the activity, leadership can be universal and situational, when leadership qualities are manifested in a certain external environment. Leaders can classify a leader-reformer, a revolutionary, a realist, a romantic, a pragmatist and an ideologist, etc.

The theory of personality traits of the leader

The most common theories of politicalleadership are the theories of personality traits, situational and situational-personal theories. "The theories of features" arose under the influence of the biologist F. Galton, who explained leadership based on heredity. This theory views the political leader as a carrier of aristocratic qualities that elevate him above other people and allow him to occupy the corresponding position in power. The parties of the approach believed that monitoring the leader would determine a universal list of qualities and would provide identification of potential leaders. American scientists (E. Bogdarus, K. Byrd, E.Viatr, R.Strogill, etc.) distinguished dozens of qualities of the leader: mind, will, initiative, sociability, sense of humor, enthusiasm, confidence, organizational abilities, friendliness, etc. time identified by the researchers traits began to coincide with a common set of psychological and social qualities. However, many great leaders did not possess all the qualities of this set.

Situational Theory of Leadership

A situational theory of leadership arose foreliminating the shortcomings of the theory of features. According to her, leadership is the product of the situation. In different situations, individual people are distinguished, which excel others in their inherent sets of qualities. Those. the fact that a person becomes a leader is connected only with external factors, and not with his personal qualities.

The concept of the defining role of followers

Adherents of this concept suggestdominant leadership attitude "leader - followers." According to this theory, the leader is nothing more than an instrument of social groups. A number of researchers perceive the leader as a "puppet". At the same time, they do not take into account the qualities necessary for the leader - independence and initiative. The influence of the leaders on the leader can also be positive: political activists largely create the image of the leader and serve as a link between him and the broad masses. The downside of this approach is that the leader's independence is underestimated.

Tip 2: Leadership as a psychological phenomenon


The leader is the person behind whom members of the grouprecognize the right to take responsible decisions that affect the interests of the whole group. Possessing authority, the leader plays a central role in the group and regulates the relationship in it.



Leadership as a psychological phenomenon


Theories of leadership

Leadership is the relationship of influence and subordination in thegroup. This is always a group phenomenon, because it is impossible to be a leader alone. The other members of the group should take a leadership role and recognize themselves as slaves. The main functions of the leader are to organize joint activities, develop a system of norms and values, responsibility for group activities, establish a favorable psychological climate in the group. The leadership phenomenon is based on the interaction of a number of characteristics . Among them - the psychological characteristics of the leader and members of the group, the particularities of the situation and the nature of the tasks being solved. The leader can become only under certain socio-political conditions, which requires a certain set of personal qualities to solve significant problems. In the theories of leadership, there are three main approaches. According to the "theory of traits", the basis of leadership is the possession of special qualities. There are different points of view as to what qualities the leader should have in order to be different from the group. Of all the signs of the leaders, activity, initiative, awareness of the problem being solved (the experience of solving the problem), the ability to influence the other members of the group, are singled out. Also, leaders must comply with the social guidelines adopted in the group. At the same time, in their image, those qualities that the population perceives as a standard should be clearly manifested. The list of leadership qualities that the supporters of the theory singled out increased steadily until in 1940 they reached the list of 79 qualities. The prevailing theory of features was soon replaced by the situational concept. It states that leadership is the product of the situation. The proponents of the theory argued that the one who became the leader in one situation may not become one in the other. Features of the leader are relative. Of course, this theory was imperfect, since the importance of the personal strength and activity of the leader in it was excluded. The third theory of leadership was the system theory. According to her, leadership is the process of organizing interpersonal relations in a group, and the leader is the subject of management of this process.

Classification of leadership

Forms of leadership manifestation are sufficientare manifold. So, you can identify the instrumental and emotional leadership. Instrumental is leadership in the business sphere. It is connected with the solution of group problems. "Expressive leadership" arises with a favorable emotional environment, but the leader does not occupy a leading position. These two types of leadership can be personified, but usually they are distributed among different people. In political science, four images of the leader also share: the standard-bearer, servant, trader and fireman. The standard bearer leads people behind him, thanks to a special ideal and model of the future. The leader-servant acts as the spokesman for the interests of his voters. The leader-merchant can attract his ideas to the public. Finally, the leader-fireman is focused on the most pressing problems. Usually these images are not found in pure form. The classification of leaders based on leadership style is quite common. According to this criterion, the American political scientist D. Barber singled out four styles of leadership. So, if the leader was oriented toward the common good, his style was called active-positive. The predominance of selfish personal motives formed an active-negative style. Strict dependence of activity on group and party preferences causes a passive-positive style. The minimal performance of their functions gives rise to a passive-negative style. Based on the distribution of leadership roles, authoritarian and democratic styles are distinguished. The first assumes one-man management, and leadership in it is based on strength. Democratic leadership involves taking into account the opinions and interests of the whole group.