Tip 1: How to write a review of a movie
Tip 1: How to write a review of a movie
So, you would like to write a review on film. Let's start with what the review differs fromrecall. A recall is an opinion about a film, a subjective assessment. The review, in addition to reviewing and evaluating the film, also provides an analysis of it. Write a review of the film - a pleasant experience: you will be aware of new products, and write about the recently released films one of the first. But that your review turned out not only interesting, but also professional, you need to know the rules and nuances of its writing.
Instructions
1
Review is most valuable when it iswritten "hot on the trail." That is, it is relevant in the first few weeks and even days after it was written. Therefore, arm yourself with a notepad and pen - and at the premiere of the film in the movie! Of course, you can see the pirated version of the new movie. But to see it in the cinema is a different level of sensations and emotions, this is the very atmosphere of the cinema. In addition, your fee for a review will quickly cover your expenses for going to the cinema.
2
Start writing a review of fresh impressions. This will make your review "live", interesting, emotional enough.
3
Come up with a headline for the review. The name of the title must also contain the name of the movie. The easiest way to name the title is "Review of the movie" Chimera. "But it's easier - it does not always mean better .The headline should be intriguing, it should interest the reader, for example," Chimera: more than an experiment ".
4
After an intriguing title, we write the introduction. Here you can "outline" the idea of the film, about which the film. You can also briefly describe the storyline of the film with the mention of the main actors. It is important not to disclose the main intrigue of the film. It may be a small understatement, for which it would be worth to see the film. In addition, avoid the banal retelling of the plot.
5
Next, analyze the film. How is the idea of the film embodied? Evaluate the artistic quality of the film, the work of the director, the actors' play, make-up, special effects, scenery, etc. Just do not need to describe in detail everything that you liked or did not like. Write in essence and make those strokes that you consider particularly worthy of attention.
6
Describe your impressions and thoughts about the film. However, avoid giving personal ratings to the first-person film. After all, you do not write a review, but a review. So, we must be objective.
7
Now we summarize the written text, and draw a conclusion. For whom this film? What will the viewer receive from viewing this film? Do I need to watch this movie?
Tip 2: How to write a work review
One write a review of the work easily, others -even afraid to start. That there were no problems in creating a review, you can use a simple plan that will direct the correct way and help you to express your opinion competently.
Instructions
1
A review is a civilized form of discussionSomething that is the analysis and evaluation of a job. The review is a genre of literary criticism and newspaper and magazine journalism. But recently the skills of creating reviews should be owned by virtually everyone, because every day hundreds of thousands of people express their opinion about some things and events. You can review almost everything: home appliances, appliances and accessories, computer technology, music, photos, films, computer games and websites, artworks, recent events, incidents, political statements. In short, anything that interests you can be subjected to a rigorous assessment, which should determine the value of the object. Without a review, scientific activities can not be dispensed with. Review of the scientific work: articles, dissertations, course and diploma work - is one of the engines of the development of science.
2
If you write a review for the first time, this is an activitymay seem very difficult for you. However, this is not so complicated, because the process of creating a review can be divided into six simple steps: Step One. Specify the subject of analysis, topic and genre of work. (You can answer the questions: what are we analyzing, what is the work about?) Step two. Think about the relevance of the topic chosen by the author. (Question: What is the topic of interest? Will it be able to interest other people?) Step Three. Briefly describe the content of the work, highlight the main points. (You can make a plan or use the content of the work if it is too large). Step four. Give an overall assessment of the work. (Question: what interested in the work? What conclusions of the author are original, new?) Step five. List the shortcomings of work, erroneous conclusions. Step Six. Make conclusions.To learn the technology of writing reviews, it is enough to go this way once or twice. And do not be afraid to make a mistake.
Tip 3: How to write a review of the text
The reason for writing a review of the text isthe desire to express one's own attitude towards what has been read. Personal opinion in this case should be carefully justified by a deep and reasoned analysis.
Instructions
1
Begin with a bibliographic descriptionworks: indicate the author, title, publisher, add the year of release and a brief (one or two sentences) retelling the content. Please note that a detailed retelling of the text reduces the value of the review, as it is not interesting to read the work. In addition, this indicates a poor quality of the reviewer's work.
2
Carry out a comprehensive text analysis, orcritical analysis. Here it is necessary to characterize such moments as: - the meaning of the name of the work - analysis of the form and content - features of the composition - the author's skill in depicting the characters; - the individual style of the writer. Pay attention to the name of the work, it must be multi-valued, it's a kind of metaphor, a symbol.
3
Pay attention when analyzing the textcompositional techniques (lithoty, antithesis, ring construction, etc.) used by the author in the work. Pay attention to what parts you can conventionally divide the text, how they are located.
4
Appreciate the style, originality of the writer's presentation. Disassemble the images of images, artistic techniques that are used in the work. Think about what is a unique, individual style.
5
Summarize, voicing the idea of the work again. It is appropriate to give a general assessment of the text and express your point of view on the importance of such in art, relevance and spiritual value.
6
Make a review of the scientific work (coursework,diploma, manuscript, thesis) according to the following plan: 1) Specify the subject of analysis (topic, genre of the work being reviewed), 2) Tell the relevance of the topic of the work, 3) Cover the summary of the work being reviewed, as well as its main provisions 4) 5) Describe the shortcomings, shortcomings of work.
Tip 4: How to write reviews for movies
Review as one of the genres of artisticCriticism and journalism should reflect not only the point of view of its author on the work. Own point of view can be called a recall. The response to the film is much easier to write than a review. In addition to personal opinion, the review should be a summary of the film, an assessment of the work of all filmmakers (from the director and actors to the composer and costume designer), as well as some recommendations for viewing. What steps are worth taking to write an objective, interesting and witty review?
Instructions
1
Before writing a review it is desirable to collectinformation about the film. You can do this before or after viewing. It is necessary to know the name of the film, its director, the main actors, the genre of cinema, its plot, the place and time of events in the film.
2
While watching a movie, it is advisable to arm yourselfNotepad and pen or pencil to make the necessary notes. These can be memorized dialogues, the appearance of a significant hero, incomprehensible situations. These notes will then help to refresh some of the initially seemingly insignificant moments. You can also fix the cinemas, which filmmakers sometimes allow. You need to be attentive and notice the smallest details: makeup, sound amplification, computer graphics, etc.
3
In the course of viewing or after it is desirableappreciate the work of all the creators of the movie. Start with the director: what he wanted to convey and how much he succeeded in it, what techniques he used, how much the title corresponds to the plot, etc. Then evaluate the scriptwriter: whether the dialogues are realistic, whether the story is original, etc., and also for the actors: whether the director's ideas have been coped with the embodiment, whether they have become accustomed to the role, etc. Do not forget about the operator, the editor, the illuminator: how clear and quality the picture on the screen (however, it's better to talk about it only to people who are versed in these issues), as well as the costumer, decorator, composer and sound technician.
4
Then you can do a rough draft of the review,a kind of draft. This can be done both by hand and on the computer. One should try to be objective, and also warn readers if the review contains spoilers.
5
Editing and bringing the review into a readable form,at first it is better to give general information about the film, but not in the form of reference, but exciting, interesting and at the same time cognitive. You can briefly describe the story, without revealing the main cards, to make a kind of announcement. This section should not be more than one paragraph.
6
After the description of the film you need to proceeddirectly to the review, i.e. general impression of viewing, thoughts that appeared after viewing, comments and estimates. And if the plot, video series or the play of some actor did not like the referee, it is important not just to show your opinion, but also to bring facts that support the position. Objectivity is the main quality that should be in the review. When it is clear in advance that the film does not like it, it's better not to watch it. It is also better to exclude from the list of peer-reviewed films those that are shot by unloved directors and in which unloved actors play.
7
End of the review can be inferred orrecommendation for viewing. The conclusion must be capacious, short and understandable. An example of this conclusion is the phrase: "It is a pity that the grandiose cast and experienced director could not fully show the dramatic nature of this story."
8
Before exposing his review to the world,it is necessary to check it for grammatical, punctuation and logical errors. It will be insulting if a competent and objective review is remembered only by the number of errors in it.
