Tip 1: How the world community relates to cloning

Medicine

Tip 1: How the world community relates to cloning

Some believe that cloning is unacceptableperversion and unjustified interference in the natural course of events. Others - that this is an encouraging scientific breakthrough that can greatly improve a person's life. One way or another, the attitude towards cloning in society is very contradictory.

Instructions

Genetic scientists involved in cloning inFirst of all they emphasize the importance of scientific and technical progress. They believe that the state should not dictate how to use scientific discoveries. He should stand aside and not interfere in the research, do not try to control anything. Otherwise, science will turn into an instrument of state ideology. Some even point to the possibility of creating an artificial population. You can select the genetic material of the most prominent people and reproduce them with cloning.

With the exception of such radical positions, fewwho endorses the prospect of cloning a person directly. Cloning a person can be used for political manipulation, for creating huge super-strong armies and capturing countries. This can lead to the destruction of all life. If it is possible to clone a person, you can create a real mess by creating several clones of famous politicians. People will have the opportunity to choose the sex of the child, and sexual imbalance may occur. In most countries, human cloning is strictly prohibited, although some enthusiasts remain.

By themselves, scientific discoveries in the field ofCloning can be very useful, but only if they are used wisely, to save lives. The public's softer attitude toward therapeutic cloning is characteristic. This type of cloning allows artificial tissue and organs to be grown artificially. Also successfully used in medicine are stem cells grown by cloning. They are used to repair damaged tissues. These cells are extracted from cloned human embryos by the age of up to a week.

The possibilities of therapeutic cloning cangive the last hope to the seriously ill and terminally ill. Perhaps, it is in him that millions of sick people of the future will be able to find salvation. And although there is no guarantee that the alien organ will be accepted by the body, it is still a chance. But here again there are opponents who are arguing about the term of the embryo from which it can be considered a human person. To avoid these attacks, scientists try to start working with the fetus as early as possible, when it is still a collection of cells. In many countries therapeutic cloning is officially approved by law.

Tip 2: The Magnitsky List. Who threatens whom?

This document, approved first by the Senate andUS House of Representatives, was recently signed by the President of America. It contains sixty names of Russian officials, each of which in one way or another is connected with the court case concerning the Hermitage Capital Management fund. These people were banned from entering the US, in addition, they were deprived of their property rights in various countries of the world, and their personal bank accounts were frozen.

Strict measures became the answer of the world communityon the trial of the case, the main person involved was lawyer Sergei Magnitsky. He was convicted of tax fraud in 2008 and died under strange circumstances in 2009 in the Moscow SIZO. In the case there are documents concerning financial frauds of the Hermitage Capital Management fund, of which it becomes known about shell companies and stolen 5 billion rubles from the state budget. Foreign human rights activists have not overlooked such a loud trial. As a result of disagreement with the Russian justice system and human rights violations, a "Magnitsky List" was created, containing the names of major officials, their positions and the charges brought against them. The United States and the European Union, which supported this document, promised that the list would be replenished with the names of Russians who would be continue to violate the rights of people fighting for the purity of justice, freedom of speech, as well as major offenders. According to Western countries, only restricting the rights to freedom of movement of these citizens can stop corruption, uphold the rights of honest citizens, and stop illegal legal prosecution. At the same time, foreigners do not care much about how Russia will react to these measures and whether it will be regarded as interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state with the imposition of its will. As it happens in such situations, the Russian side took retaliatory steps. One of them is a bill on visa and economic sanctions imposed on violations of the rights of Russian citizens in the United States. Another response stone was the ban on the adoption of Russian orphans by American citizens. What the answer to all this the US can only guess. It is likely that these are the first symptoms of the beginning of a new "cold" war. The West now has a button of pressure on the legislative elite of the Russian state. And the Russian elite has to choose more carefully, in which banks to keep their savings and on the territory of which foreign states to purchase real estate. How justified is the adoption of the "Magnitsky List" by the US? As always, the truth is somewhere in the middle. Certainly, the death of a lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, in the SIZO is a fact of a flagrant violation of human rights. In such situations, all the guilty must necessarily be punished, from what has happened it is necessary to draw lessons to prevent such incidents in the future. At the same time, it is necessary to understand that the West still regards Russia as its main rival in the foreign policy arena. To date, Russia is the only country in the world capable of assuredly destroying the US and its allies. Proceeding from this, Russia will always be pressured, using any opportunities for this. The leadership of the country understands this perfectly, therefore, according to the long-established unwritten tradition, all hostile attacks against Russia respond with adequate measures.